Skip to content

Posts tagged ‘supporters direct’

Biased opinions

It strikes me as amazing that in today’s modern society we still witness discrimination and bias towards sectors of our population.

A missive from Supporters Direct brought a recent activity to my attention that necessitated a stand for equality.  The instance was a match played between Wrexham AFC and Bromley at The Glyndwr University Wrexham, Racecourse Stadium.  It was marketed and branded as a dedication to supporting ‘Football versus Homophobia’ (FvH).  FvH is an international Initiative opposing homophobia in football at all levels – from grassroots to professional clubs. It originated following Justin Fashanu’s untimely death by suicide.  This led to the formation of the ‘Justin Campaign’ in 2010.  Along with raising awareness, the Campaign has a strong focus on Art, Events, Education and Sports (including football).

Today is International Women Day.  Whilst we should be celebrating the female gender, football announces that discrimination is still rife.  A Survey in the Guardian has discovered that 25% of women working in football have suffered bullying; and the ‘Authorities’ (surprise, surprise!) are still not doing enough to address sexism in football.

The campaigning organisation, ‘Women in Football’, which published the Survey, said the game had an “ingrained, systemic problem of sexist culture” and criticised football’s institutions for not doing enough to improve it.

It reminds me what happened to the multi-coloured laces Initiative?

Thankfully at ACROBAT |FCSM and UCFB we have no such bias and are proud to be working with fantastic people from all genders and sexual orientation.  Wake up Britain – “All’s fair in love and SPORT”.

Clear Blue Skies Over Edgeley

… But Cloud Over Football

Today heralded Port Vale Football Club entering Administration – a status, all too familiar to fans of Stockport County.  This is the 92nd insolvency in the top five divisions of English football since 1992. The equivalent of the entire top-four divisions of English professional football!

The Football Authorities have also just released their joint response to the recommendations of the Culture Media and Sport Select Committee Inquiry and the Government’s input on improving the regulation and governance of English football. At this stage, Stockport County Supporters’ Co-operative seeks to emphasise that the proposals are not what we were hoping for. Although they have proposed the introduction of a licensing system, in our view, this stage of the reform process only addresses the ‘principle of licensing’ and thus, doesn’t go far enough.

We endorse the opinions of Supporters Direct and its proposals on this matter, including a clear proposal for supporter-engagement through supporters’ trusts. Stockport County Supporters Co-operative is part of a wider movement of organisations, under this umbrella body, established by supporters of football clubs now stretching not just across England, or the UK, but also across Europe. Ashley Simpson, Chair at the Co-operative commented: “If the substantive issues are not addressed, we fully expect the current trend of insolvencies and financial strife affecting football to continue.”

Stockport County Supporters’ Co-operative and Supporters’ Direct welcomes proposals in the football industry that can help supporters’ trusts to increase their influence in club governance and ownership.

This is a press release that I prepared for the Co-operative. The full stance on governance from Supporters Direct is available at:

Welcome Chair

‘Clear Blue Skies’ thought the article to be somewhat “terse”, so rather than let it go to waste, I publish a short interview with new Chair to Stockport County Supporters’ Trust, Ashley Simpson:

A lot of people have a similar background as supporters and season ticket holders but very few show an interest in the Co-op. What prompted you to get involved?

I am committed to Stockport County and have been dedicated to the ‘Co-op concept’ for some time. I am also Vice-Chair of Manchester and District’s Executive Committee of the Co-operative Party; and work as a consultant on behalf of the Co-operative College, specialising in membership development of the network of Co-operative Schools throughout the Country.

For those who have lost interest or simply don’t know, what is the Supporters Co-op? Isn’t it just a continuation of the trust, whose ownership saw us fall into administration?

Some supporters may ask why the need still for a supporters’ co-operative?  The simple reason is the fundamental principle that a football club is better off if there is a healthy, balanced and constructive relationship with its’ supporters and the community it serves.  Supporters-Direct have recently said in stressing the importance of regrouping and changing to respond to future needs, that the Co-op is “from the fans, those who understand most of all what matters about their football club……. owners, players and managers come and go but the fans are constant is a truism”.

Since administration, the Co-op has been quietly working behind the scenes. What is the vision of the current board? Does it have any specific aims?

Under the stewardship of the out-going Chair, Graham Privett, the initial goal had to be survival and ensuring that the concept of supporters’ governance was not cast into the past – but instead grasped as to a model that can bring significant benefits to the Club.  The focus of the Co-op has been published as:

VISION: To be the democratic and representative voice of the supporters of Stockport County Football Club, and to strengthen the bonds between the Club and the community which it serves.

OBJECTIVES: To obtain a stake in Stockport County Football Club.

To have a Supporter-Director on the Board of the Club, democratically elected by all supporters

To hold the owners to account, and try to ensure that the Club is run sustainably and with mutual benefit to the local community.

PRIORITIES: To be fully prepared to take action towards these objectives should any opportunity arise

To take forward our social goals and community development

To be ready to set up and run a “phoenix” club if needed.

How does the board function? Who is involved, who does what and how much time is spent?

Ashley Simpson (Chair)

Mary McGee Wood (Secretary – Independent)

Pauline Lawson (Treasurer)

Graham Privett (Events)

Matt Cook (Membership)

Adrian Stores (Marketing and fundraising)

Mark Savery (Accounts and website communications)

Ian Watts (Affiliate – Heritage/SCAN)

Involvement is via formal Board Meetings, Development Days, conference calls and getting together on matchdays. All directors are volunteers and committed to the principles above. Each has a portfolio of activities that are addressed on a weekly basis.

What do you say to those who dismiss the idea of fan organisations such as the SCFC Co-op? Why is it important to put aside prejudices from the previous regime?

Stockport County Supporters’ Co-operative is part of a wider movement of organisations established by supporters of football clubs now stretching not just across England, or the UK, but also across Europe.  I believe “Co-operation” is the most sustainable business model due to the 7 values and principles which underpin a Co-operative enterprise. This vehicle enables football fans to have the ultimate voice on how their football club is run, thus enabling them to fulfil their own destiny in their community.

For more information about the Stockport County Supporters’ Co-operative, including how to join: visit the website at

Sports marketing in emerging markets

I was asked to contemplate this subject, based upon my overseas work; and especially to compare and contrast practices between the United Kingdom and Turkey with a sprinkling of anecdotes.

1. The power of learning: The collaboration between both countries has been apparent in many ways. Often a starting point is the innovation and proactivity of educational establishments. We have recently co-ordinated a successful conference called “Haydi futboldas olalim” (or “Let’s be football friends”). In planning for the event, my colleagues and I had consultations with leading universities and were particularly impressed on the sports educational front by both Kadir Has and Bahçeşehir. This in terms of forward thinking, curriculum, facilities and enthusiasm. Obviously, we start with this comment as a common grounding in sports education and marketing stems from the qualifications that are obtained post-mainstream schooling. Arguably. British sports marketing options at universities and further education are more mature, but there is no reason to doubt the suitability of the increasingly popular Turkish alternative. We helped to pull together an impressive panel of both academics and practitioners in Istanbul. These included: Turkish Football Federation (TFF), Birkbeck College (London) and FC United of Manchester (FCUM). I represented FC Sports Marketing. The papers presented, considered the pros and cons of governance and the suitability of the adoption of such as the FCUM model to Turkey’s professional sport. Many of the reasons that underpins greater supporters’ ownership and governance worldwide are equally applicable to Turkey, yet the desire for change appears still in need to be proven. In recent months we have witnessed, hooliganism, lack of family orientation, missed tricks on commercial marketing and alleged match-fixing. Maybe it’s just that one club needs to ‘put its toes in the water’ and others will follow suit. We could be helping this very first step in the year of the ‘Istanbul European Capital of Sport 2012’. Next stop for us is a ‘bit part’ in the “International Congress on Sports Management and Economics”. This time moving from Istanbul to Izmir. Its focus appears in the programme to be to “review and analyze sports industry within the framework of economics, management and business discipline.” Maybe I’m mistaken but at first glance perhaps a more scholarly communication – yet the timing is ripe for a debate on ‘where are we now, where do we want to go to’ etc.

2. Marketing and the feminine touch: The media coverage in the UK, looking in at Turkey has had a positive tone recently. Another inspirational concept surrounded a footballing spectacle with a global grasp of attention. The topic in question is one that I’ve covered in my personal blogosphere. I refer to the incident concerning Fenerbache and other instances of fans’ violence. It was expected that empty stadiums would be a foregone conclusion (incidentally, I’ve never seen the painted hoardings of spectators in the UK as they have done in Turkey when fans are banned from a fixture). The Turks however, brought a novel approach, with input from our friends at the TFF. They opened the gates to the match against Manisaspor, but only to — women and children under the age of 12. That’s right no men, the traditional, majority in the stadium. It doesn’t stop there. All tickets were free of charge. A whopping 40,000 crowd attended the fixture. The singing and hospitality was more ‘lady like’ in tone and activity also. How can this impact on the Country’s sport which mirrors many of the problems that were former ‘evils’ of the British counterpart in former years? Maybe not at all – but I would have hoped at the very least there will be an increased sensitivity to appreciating the aspirations of all segments of the supporting population, and maybe this could be catalyst to increasing ‘football in the community’ which has not been as well explored as it has in the United Kingdom helping numerous beneficiaries in an array of subjects from good citizenship, healthy living, child safety, sport and exercise and learning.

3. Playing hard ball: Another anecdote, and one that I continue to investigate is the differences that we have recently witnessed when assisting in the establishment of a new merchandise and toy distributor in Turkey. Our roles were both consultative and negotiative in co-operation with our respective contacts at Galatasaray, Besiktas and Fenerbache. We were promoting an opportunity that was already adopted, for a Scandinavian company, with the giants of European football branding including Chelsea, Manchester United, Barcelona, Real Madrid and Juventus. As a generality, we have found the ‘Turkish nut’ a tougher one to crack. Not in terms of not succeeding but there has been a tendency to more desire for substantial up front deposits from any affinity between a manufacturer and a club (and use of its brand). Understandable, yes – and with common facets to many a deal that we do in the Barclays Premier League; yet I wonder whether the earlier accepted success fee only and dependency on royalties, however significant, is a tact that will bare fruit in Turkey?

4. New sports: At short notice, we were approached to assist in formulative plans on introducing the sport of rugby to Turkey. The approach came via another agency, which had limited expertise in rugby. We organised for some of our contacts including former Sale Sharks Lock and Coach (England Counties XV), Dave Baldwin, plus representative(s) of the Rugby Football Union to visit Istanbul for preliminary discussions with an intended follow on to provide a ‘roadmap’ for the development of a Turkish National Rugby team and also a long term grass roots development plan for the Country. Subject to funding from the General Directorate of Youth and Sports and possibly the International Rugby Board (IRB), there is a huge opportunity and hopefully one that we will assist further on. I get the impression that the powers that be are looking to ensure a proper representation of Turkish sports people and athletes across some sports that have not traditionally been pursued by the indigenous population. This all packaged around the bigger picture of pursuing the ‘Olympic Dream’. I have noticed that Lacrosse has just started in Turkey but again by an immigrant from the United Kingdom. I believe (or so they say), this was how football was introduced to the Country also?

6. Governance: I make no apology for returning back to ‘Governance’ as a differentiator between the respective countries. FC Sports Marketing and I are perfectly positioned to advise those clubs, irrespective of sport, when they take that leap of faith. I’m assuming, it will only be a matter of time. Supporters’ Direct (SD) is a key protagonist helping sports organisations with guidance and knowledge-share on this subject. One of the closest taking that plunge has been FC Aris. SD is the overseeing organisation formed by the British Government (with cross-party, political agreement) to provide support to ‘supporters’ trusts (fans) to secure a greater level of accountability and democracy within football clubs and more recently in other sports that include rugby. Notable milestones in this movement have been 170 supporters’ trusts formed, the active engagement of more than 270,000 fans and 26 trusts having achieved majority equity stakes in the clubs in which they are involved. Trusts are now established under the auspices of SD in ten European Countries. To appreciate the context and sea-change that will be needed, I paraphrase a recent constitution of an evolving trust, it set as prime objectives: To seek to acquire a shareholding in the sports club; To have an elected member attending meetings of the Board of Directors; To be the pioneer, in any relaunch or ‘phoenix’ club in the eventuality financial difficulties arise. Already, one can appreciate how this is a big move in many Turkish clubs – but an option that possesses benefits for the appropriate converts.